I said back in my review of the first Hunger Games film that I hadn't yet read the books before seeing the film, a rarity for me. Since the first movie did so well that sequels were inevitable, I went out and read all of the books before seeing Catching Fire, the 2nd film (and book) in the series.
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - 2013, rated PG-13. My rating: 8.5 out of 10.
The second film in the series picks up a few months after the events of the first. Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence, who seriously never takes a day off because she's in like every movie these days) & Peeta (Josh Hutcherson), the winners of the previous year's Hunger Games, find that their defiance of the Capitol in the previous year's games has resulted in rebellions and riots forming and spreading throughout the twelve subjugated districts. When their victory tour, forced upon them for having won, fails to suppress but instead foments additional riots, the President of the Capitol is extremely displeased. He changes the rules for the next year's Hunger Games, forcing the duo back into the gladiatorial arena against their will, in a Hunger Games comprised solely of previous winners. In other words, all 24 people competing in the games have won the grisly fight to the death, so there are no newbies that have no clue what they are doing when the fighting begins.
The first two-thirds of the film focuses on the emerging rebellion, the Capitol's brutality contrasted with its wasteful decadence and shallowness, and Katniss' growing discomfort with herself becoming the symbol of a rebellion. The final third brings us back into the arena, but it shows far less of the combat than the previous film, for reasons that I am not going to spoil here. The film ends on a bit of a cliffhanger, which makes sense as it is the middle book of a trilogy (but in this case the films are going to be a foursome, as the final book Mockingjay is being split into two parts). But overall, if you liked the first film in the series, you'll enjoy this one more. Having gotten the character introductions primarily out of the way in the first film, the second film flows a lot better and doesn't drag as much as the first film did in places. I'm looking forward to parts 3 and 4, when they come out in November of 2014 and 2015.
Welcome to my blog, featuring my musings on my life, my family, the news, politics, and best of all - Pop culture: Movies, TV, video games, and music. Posts are categorized as follows - PCP: Pop Culture Panorama. FML: Fatherhood Means Laughter. POS: Politics or Stupidity. As you may notice, I like witty acronyms. Follow the links on the right for posts under each section.
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
PCP in Theaters - The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug
As I mentioned in my review last year for part 1 of The Hobbit, I am a huge J.R.R.
Tolkien fan, so seeing The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug in theaters for me
was a given. I finally had a chance to catch it recently and here are my
thoughts on the film.
The Hobbit: The
Desolation of Smaug – 2013, rated PG-13. My rating: 9 out of 10.
Once again, Peter Jackson knocks it out of the park with his
creation of Middle-Earth. Just like the previous films in the series, the
production design is excellent, with amazing attention to detail on all of the
various towns and buildings created for the film. He really brings to life all
of the places from the novel, with breathtaking results.
The film itself continues the journey of hobbit Bilbo
Baggins and a company of 12 dwarves to attempt to reclaim the dwarves’ home
from the dragon, Smaug, that has taken it over. We finally see Smaug in this
film, voiced by the great Benedict Cumberbatch. His voice brings a malevolent but regal power to the dragon,
who is also beautifully rendered by the CGI animators for the film. Hearing him
talk as the dragon reminded me a lot of his performance as Khan in Star TrekInto Darkness from
earlier in the year.
Just like the first Hobbit, it is hard to rate a film that
is inherently incomplete. This middle bridge of the trilogy does a great job of
getting the characters where they need to be, the Lonely Mountain, but it ends
on a cliffhanger because the book it is based on is not yet finished. This one
was better than the first one though, with less expository dialogue and far
more action than the first film contained. Most memorably, the river barrel
escape sequence combined great action and thrills with some very funny moments
as well. This film also contained a lot of departures from the book though,
including a character made up by Peter Jackson and not Tolkien, Tauriel, played by Lost's Evangeline Lilly. I for one do not mind the changes that Jackson has made, however,
as I find they add more depth to the book than Tolkien had originally written.
The changes better flesh out the world and make it feel more complete. I also
like the fact that the film shows us more in detail the trials Gandalf faces
that were only hinted at in the book but never shown.
Overall, part 2 of the Hobbit was an improvement over the
first film, and I really hate the fact that I have to wait until the end of
2014 for the conclusion of this gorgeous trilogy. I know that I’ll be there in
theaters when it comes out, however, as I am looking forward to the conclusion.
The film ends on a great place for the final act to begin, one that seems like
it is going to be chock full of action throughout. I can’t wait!
Thursday, January 9, 2014
PCP on DVD - Movie Backlog Clearout
Since I haven't had the time to write reviews because of grad school, but have still had the time to watch movies, I have once again developed a backlog of movies that need to be reviewed. Like I have in the past, I'm going to do a clear-out post of my backlog by posting really short reviews of 23 movies I caught within the past 6 months that I don't want to write more than a paragraph about. There were some good movies in this batch, some bad ones too, but I just want to get their reviews done so I can focus on longer posts on the movies I actually want to write about (i.e. the really good ones). So, without further ado, here are the quick reviews in alphabetical order.
21 & Over - 2013, rated R. My rating: 5 out of 10. It's a college drinking movie about a 21st birthday celebration. It has its funny moments but nothing particularly original really. Basically, it's a lot like The Hangover retold for a new generation.
About Cherry - 2012, rated R. My rating: 4 out of 10. A lame girl moves to California and gets into the skin industry. Probably the most pointless well acted film I've ever seen. Lame ending left me asking "what was the point?" Don't waste an hour and a half of your life.
A Good Day to Die Hard -2013, rated PG-13. My rating: 5 out of 10. Were this named anything else and not part of the Die Hard franchise it'd probably warrant a 6 or 7, but it gets points off for sullying the name of the greatest action flick ever. Please stop making films in this franchise, thanks.
Beautiful Creatures - 2013, rated PG-13. My rating: 6.5 out of 10. Yet another young adult novel adaptation hoping to be the next Twilight franchise. It has cool effects for the witchcraft moments, and fun scenery-chewing performances, especially from Emmy Rossum. I don't think it did well enough for them to continue the series though.
Celeste & Jesse Forever - 2012, rated R. My rating: 8 out of 10. Funny but touching, but also majorly depressing. It's not a romantic comedy date movie, it's more sort of like PS I Love You in the fact that it's a depressing love story. Rashida Jones & Andy Samberg are awesome though.
Hanna - 2011, rated R. My rating: 6 out of 10. Well done action sequences offset by sucky plot meant that I found it hard to care about any of the characters. But, as I said the action sequences were pretty bad-ass, so that prevented the film from being a total waste.
Keep reading! There's more after the jump! --->
21 & Over - 2013, rated R. My rating: 5 out of 10. It's a college drinking movie about a 21st birthday celebration. It has its funny moments but nothing particularly original really. Basically, it's a lot like The Hangover retold for a new generation.
About Cherry - 2012, rated R. My rating: 4 out of 10. A lame girl moves to California and gets into the skin industry. Probably the most pointless well acted film I've ever seen. Lame ending left me asking "what was the point?" Don't waste an hour and a half of your life.
A Good Day to Die Hard -2013, rated PG-13. My rating: 5 out of 10. Were this named anything else and not part of the Die Hard franchise it'd probably warrant a 6 or 7, but it gets points off for sullying the name of the greatest action flick ever. Please stop making films in this franchise, thanks.
Beautiful Creatures - 2013, rated PG-13. My rating: 6.5 out of 10. Yet another young adult novel adaptation hoping to be the next Twilight franchise. It has cool effects for the witchcraft moments, and fun scenery-chewing performances, especially from Emmy Rossum. I don't think it did well enough for them to continue the series though.
Celeste & Jesse Forever - 2012, rated R. My rating: 8 out of 10. Funny but touching, but also majorly depressing. It's not a romantic comedy date movie, it's more sort of like PS I Love You in the fact that it's a depressing love story. Rashida Jones & Andy Samberg are awesome though.
Hanna - 2011, rated R. My rating: 6 out of 10. Well done action sequences offset by sucky plot meant that I found it hard to care about any of the characters. But, as I said the action sequences were pretty bad-ass, so that prevented the film from being a total waste.
Keep reading! There's more after the jump! --->
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)